Questions, questions, questions!
Reading links for people in search of the truth
Hooray for The Guardian - Not perfect but a cut above!
All articles of substance should raise more questions about ourselves, our own situation, and prompt us to make comparisons.
“Goliath: Life and Loathing in Greater Israel”- Max Blumenthal Essential reading Chris Hedges' review my favourite. Try to see how this affects us in this part of the world. Find out about Jewish people who are grieving for the loss of the things they dreamed of in their world because of the slaughter and apartheid in their country, Israel. If people are asking where Israel exists then we should also ask whether Kenya really exists or is it just a figment of a collective imagination and/ or dream... and can it be fulfilled? Why and why not?
http://buff.ly/1gQyCP1
Don't let the media brainwash you. Think for yourself.
Dan Gilmore
The Guardian
What is the Transpacific Partnership (TPP) and how does it affect us in Kenya and Africa? Please send your opinions to me. Clue: Think about a marriage between the big corporates and the government, where the government plays the feminine and submissive role.
http://t.co/ASQNjD5SO4
Who influences your thinking? How do you know that the approach you are taking towards the solutions being touted for you by those whom you respect in authority is a suitable one for you and the future? Do they really know what they are doing?
Pussy Riot's Nadezhda Tolokonnikova
and Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Žižek
meet in an extraordinary exchange of letters
The Guardian
Why is Pussy Riot a very important group? What actually happened to them? One of them was sent to prison for singing that the blind are leading are blind. She got hospitalised because she went on a hunger strike. She has a child out there whom she is separated from, and is dealing with the challenges of holding to her sanity (because she is being punished simply for following the logic of she is led to by her intellect). Here she is conversing by letter from the prison with a philosopher. What are they talking about? The disaffection of a population forced to live in accordance with a system that doesn't work beyond mediocrity, forced not to think beyond what they are allowed to think? Does this compare with the way we are in our part of the world?
http://www.theguardian.com/music/2013/nov/15/pussy-riot-nadezhda-tolokonnikova-slavoj-zizek
The Independent
An article on Mahinda Rajapaksa, accused of War Crimes. Is this the level of hate we want to take it to in Africa?
Frances Harrison (Expert on the destruction of the Tamils in Sri Lanka)
Did you know that 40,000 people have been killed or have gone missing in Sri Lanka? Are aware of the kinds of tortures members of the Tamil Tigers suffered after they lost the war there? It's gory reading. There's one story of a man (look up Frances Harrison on Google and find some videos there - there was a recent BBC docu about what has happened to these men) where an object of (sc)raping him was made from a pipe and barbed wire. What is it about men that they allow themselves to be reduced to a level below animals and resort to torture? Why is there no proof? Why is it so silent when questions are asked. David Cameron was there recently at the Commonwealth Conference and he became quite a hero. But what sacrifices would he be willing to make in order to find some answers?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/hero-or-war-criminal-sri-lankan-leader-mahinda-rajapaksa-under-pressure-8940591.html?origin=internalSearch
Saturday, 16 November 2013
Matrimonial Bill: Women's rights in marriage and divorce in Kenya and the rest of the world
November 16th, 2013
Matrimonial Bill
My opinion
It's not too difficult to calculate the woman's contribution in terms of time and dedication without cutting her off from her right to stay where she lived. What's the big deal? You can't kick the woman out. Man has to leave and ensure she has a home and amenities and the ability to improve her lot. All women, including prostitutes and Sugar Daddy predators, have rights over their men and men in general. In being provided those rights women's trust in men will improve. That is one step in the right direction towards a more enlightened society. Women go bad only after men have gone rotten.
Okay, now women - you take the lead: Where are the exceptions to such a rule?
Here are some links from Google:
[PDF]
Women Lawyers – Kenya and the International Women's Human Rights .... Existing Marriage and Divorce Laws Rob Women of Their Matrimonial Property .
[PDF]
A. Gaps in Divorce Laws and Wide Judicial Discretion Leave Women with Nothing at Divorce, Violating their Rights to Equality, Housing, and an Adequate
Apr 4, 2012 - People have woken up to their family rights and unlike in the olden days, ... Kenyan law prohibits the presentation of a divorce petition to a court of law ... WITH Kituo Cha Sheria, The federation of women lawyers Kenya (FIDA).
[PDF]
3 days ago - the small number of Kenyan female MPs is handicapping efforts to push through legislation promoting women's rights, in a country where men ...
Kenya Law Reforms Commission KLRC Bills Laws. ... Defines marriage as the voluntary union of a man and a woman whether monogamous or ... Parties to a marriage have equal rights at the time of the marriage, during the marriage and at
The general position of the Law in Kenya is that Kenya is governed by various ... Divorce, Annulments, Judicial Separations, Restitution of Conjugal rights, ... man keeps one or more other women as his wives without declaring marriage.
Marriage in Kenya: Bring original and copies of the Identity Cards or ... After 21 days, the couple completes the affidavit under S 11 of the Marriage Act, gets it commissioned by the Registrar and completes ... This is not a right and can be denied. ... Female Celebrities in Kenya · Top Ten Male and Female Musicians in Kenya ...
[DOC]
WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND THE LAW IN KENYA ..... Other than this, the Marriage Bill (1985) gives equal rights to spouses in a marriage in matters concerning ...
Matrimonial Bill
Matrimonial Bill: Just who makes greatest contribution in marriage?
10 hours ago -
By LILLIAN ALUANGA-DELVAUX ... Five years into the marriage, Jacob landed a job in an European capital that came with a monthly salary of Sh1 million. ... “It is not only in divorce that issues of how to share matrimonial property come up. ... care', which is a contributor to the country's economic growth.
My opinion
It's not too difficult to calculate the woman's contribution in terms of time and dedication without cutting her off from her right to stay where she lived. What's the big deal? You can't kick the woman out. Man has to leave and ensure she has a home and amenities and the ability to improve her lot. All women, including prostitutes and Sugar Daddy predators, have rights over their men and men in general. In being provided those rights women's trust in men will improve. That is one step in the right direction towards a more enlightened society. Women go bad only after men have gone rotten.
Okay, now women - you take the lead: Where are the exceptions to such a rule?
Here are some links from Google:
Women Land and Property Rights in Kenya - FIDA Kenya
fidakenya.org/wp-content/.../Land-and-Property-Report-May-8-09.pdf
Women Property Rights - FIDA Kenya
fidakenya.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/.../Women-property-rights.pdf
Divorce in Kenya: What the law says | The Star
www.the-star.co.ke/news/article-23756/divorce-kenya-what-law-says
Law and the Status of Women in Kenya - International ...
www.ielrc.org/content/a9501.pdf
by J Kabeberi-Macharia - Cited by 3 - Related articles
Civil Law. 4. Legal Capacity. 4. Rights Relating to Marriage. 5. Rights of Inheritance. 8 ... In this chapter, we look at the legal status of women in Kenya. II.Kenyan women to fight bill denying them property rights in divorce
www.trust.org/item/20131113164113-e6i3l/
Marriage Bill, 2013 - Kenya Law Reform Commission (KLRC)
www.klrc.go.ke › Bills
Legal/Statutory Marriage in Kenya - Infotrack East Africa Ltd.
www.infotrackea.co.ke/.../index.php?...legal-marriage...kenya...
Marriage in Kenya | Kenya Law - Kenya by Kenyans
softkenya.com/law/marriage-in-kenya/
Gender Considerations in Constitution-Making- Engendering ...
ir.library.strathmore.edu/researcherFileDownload.action?researcherFileId...
Friday, 15 November 2013
What are our rights as disenfranchised citizens of the world producing most of its resources?
This is an article that reads and that contains links that explain why and how the corporations are married to any government on the planet and for what reason. TRAWL through it or PLOUGH through it but GET through it anyhow you can, please:
@kirimba (on twitter)
The persona of government is being abused and has become a reluctant malaya but the corporations are very patriarchaic, if you'll forgive the corruption of that word and they are banging away.
From The Guardian direct - Why doesn't the link open? Trying to redirect here.
3:43 PM 11/15/2013
Taken from The Guardian because their link does not open for some reason for some of us:
Dan Gillmor: On digital being
Thanks to WikiLeaks, we see just how bad TPP trade deal is for regular people
The more you know about the odious Trans-Pacific Partnership, the less you'll like it. It's made for corporate intellectual property and profits
SOPA protest
A protester demonstrates against the proposed Stop Online Piracy Act (Sopa) in New York. It might be time to do the same against the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Photograph: Mario Tama/Getty Images
Among the many betrayals of the Obama administration is its overall treatment of what many people refer to as "intellectual property" – the idea that ideas themselves and digital goods and services are exactly like physical property, and that therefore the law should treat them the same way. This corporatist stance defies both reality and the American Constitution, which expressly called for creators to have rights for limited periods, the goal of which was to promote inventive progress and the arts.
In the years 2007 and 2008, candidate Obama indicated that he'd take a more nuanced view than the absolutist one from Hollywood and other interests that work relentlessly for total control over this increasingly vital part of our economy and lives. But no clearer demonstration of the real White House view is offered than a just-leaked draft of an international treaty that would, as many had feared, create draconian new rights for corporate "owners" and mean vastly fewer rights for the rest of us.
I'm talking about the appalling Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement, a partial draft of which WikiLeaks has just released. This treaty has been negotiated in secret meetings dominated by governments and corporations. You and I have been systematically excluded, and once you learn what they're doing, you can see why.
The outsiders who understand TPP best aren't surprised. That is, the draft "confirms fears that the negotiating parties are prepared to expand the reach of intellectual property rights, and shrink consumer rights and safeguards," writes James Love a longtime watcher of this process.
Needless to say, copyright is a key part of this draft. And the negotiators would further stiffen copyright holders' control while upping the ante on civil and criminal penalties for infringers. The Electronic Frontier Foundation says TPP has "extensive negative ramifications for users' freedom of speech, right to privacy and due process, and hinder peoples' abilities to innovate". It's Hollywood's wish list.
Canadian intellectual property expert Michael Geist examined the latest draft of the intellectual property chapter. He writes that the document, which includes various nations' proposals, shows the US government, in particular, taking a vastly different stance than the other nations. Geist notes:
[Other nations have argued for] balance, promotion of the public domain, protection of public health, and measures to ensure that IP rights themselves do not become barriers to trade. The opposition to these objective[s] by the US and Japan (Australia has not taken a position) speaks volumes about their goals for the TPP.
The medical industry has a stake in the outcome, too, with credible critics saying it would raise drug prices and, according to Love's analysis, give surgeons patent protection for their procedures.
Congress has shown little appetite for restraining the overweening power of the corporate interests promoting this expansion. With few exceptions, lawmakers have repeatedly given copyright, patent and trademark interests more control over the years. So we shouldn't be too optimistic about the mini-flurry of Capitol Hill opposition to the treaty that emerged this week. It's based much more on Congress protecting its prerogatives – worries about the treaty's so-called "fast track" authorities, giving the president power to act without congressional approval – than on substantive objections to the document's contents.
That said, some members of Congress have become more aware of the deeper issues. The public revolt against the repugnant "Stop Online Piracy Act" two years ago was a taste of what happens when people become more widely aware of what they can lose when governments and corporate interests collude.
If they become aware – that's the key. One of TPP's most abhorrent elements has been the secrecy under which it's been negotiated. The Obama administration's fondness for secret laws, policies and methods has a lot to do with a basic reality: the public would say no to much of which is done in our names and with our money if we knew what was going on. As Senator Elizabeth Warren pointed out, in a letter to the White House:
I have heard the argument that transparency would undermine the administration's policy to complete the trade agreement because public opposition would be significant. If transparency would lead to widespread public opposition to a trade agreement, then that trade agreement should not be the policy of the United States. I believe in transparency and democracy and I think the US Trade Representative should too.
Thanks to WikiLeaks, we have at least partial transparency today. The more you know about the odious TPP, the less you'll like it – and that's why the administration and its corporate allies don't want you to know.
Related
13 Nov 2013
WikiLeaks publishes secret draft chapter of Trans-Pacific Partnership
11 Nov 2013
Want 'free trade'? Open the medical and drug industry to competition
11 Nov 2013
Vince Cable counts on Russia visit to boost exports
5 Nov 2013
Global financial crisis hit happiness and trust in governments – OECD
More from the Guardian
The Golden Compass recap: how a literary triumph was turned to dust 10 Nov 2013
Hunger Games stars tell Jennifer Lawrence to return Oscar for forgetting lines 11 Nov 2013
The problem with anti-rape underwear 11 Nov 2013
The chances for gun control in the US are slim 13 Nov 2013
Lily Allen does not represent all feminism – and nor should she 13 Nov 2013
What's this?
More from around the web
You Snooze, You Lose? Wrong. Russell Foster on the Science of Sleep (The Financialist)
Patrick Stewart Officially Married…Thanks to Ian McKellen (Theater Mania)
9 Maps to Change How You See the World (Goodnet)
10 Predictions on the Future of Technology (Enterprise Efficiency)
Ten countries account for 76% of total enslaved people (globalslaveryindex.org)
NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
More from On digital being
Dan Gillmor is director of the Knight centre for digital media entrepreneurship at Arizona State University's Walter Cronkite school of journalism and mass communication. His most recent book is Mediactive (2010), also a blog of the same name, about how people can be empowered as new media users. This series focuses on technological developments, especially as they affect media, and aims to show how people can move from being passive consumers of media to active users. Follow Dan on Twitter @dangillmor
WikiLeaks publishes secret draft chapter of Trans-Pacific Partnership
WikiLeaks publishes secret draft chapter of Trans-Pacific Partnership
13 Nov 2013
The Trans-Pacific Partnership, negotiated in secret between 12 Pacific Rim nations, "would trample over individual rights and free expression" according to Julian Assange
11 Nov 2013
Want 'free trade'? Open the medical and drug industry to competition
11 Nov 2013
Vince Cable counts on Russia visit to boost exports
5 Nov 2013
Global financial crisis hit happiness and trust in governments – OECD
Julian Assange may get chance at Senate seat in Western Australia
Julian Assange may get chance at Senate seat in Western Australia
4 Nov 2013
If the high court orders a fresh election the WikiLeaks party founder could make up for not being elected in Victoria
© 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.
www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/nov/13/trFigure out how it affects us and write to me. I'll throw light on the relevant questions if you engage me.
ans-pacific-partnership-intellectual-property
@kirimba (on twitter)
The persona of government is being abused and has become a reluctant malaya but the corporations are very patriarchaic, if you'll forgive the corruption of that word and they are banging away.
From The Guardian direct - Why doesn't the link open? Trying to redirect here.
3:43 PM 11/15/2013
Taken from The Guardian because their link does not open for some reason for some of us:
Dan Gillmor: On digital being
Thanks to WikiLeaks, we see just how bad TPP trade deal is for regular people
The more you know about the odious Trans-Pacific Partnership, the less you'll like it. It's made for corporate intellectual property and profits
SOPA protest
A protester demonstrates against the proposed Stop Online Piracy Act (Sopa) in New York. It might be time to do the same against the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Photograph: Mario Tama/Getty Images
Among the many betrayals of the Obama administration is its overall treatment of what many people refer to as "intellectual property" – the idea that ideas themselves and digital goods and services are exactly like physical property, and that therefore the law should treat them the same way. This corporatist stance defies both reality and the American Constitution, which expressly called for creators to have rights for limited periods, the goal of which was to promote inventive progress and the arts.
In the years 2007 and 2008, candidate Obama indicated that he'd take a more nuanced view than the absolutist one from Hollywood and other interests that work relentlessly for total control over this increasingly vital part of our economy and lives. But no clearer demonstration of the real White House view is offered than a just-leaked draft of an international treaty that would, as many had feared, create draconian new rights for corporate "owners" and mean vastly fewer rights for the rest of us.
I'm talking about the appalling Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement, a partial draft of which WikiLeaks has just released. This treaty has been negotiated in secret meetings dominated by governments and corporations. You and I have been systematically excluded, and once you learn what they're doing, you can see why.
The outsiders who understand TPP best aren't surprised. That is, the draft "confirms fears that the negotiating parties are prepared to expand the reach of intellectual property rights, and shrink consumer rights and safeguards," writes James Love a longtime watcher of this process.
Needless to say, copyright is a key part of this draft. And the negotiators would further stiffen copyright holders' control while upping the ante on civil and criminal penalties for infringers. The Electronic Frontier Foundation says TPP has "extensive negative ramifications for users' freedom of speech, right to privacy and due process, and hinder peoples' abilities to innovate". It's Hollywood's wish list.
Canadian intellectual property expert Michael Geist examined the latest draft of the intellectual property chapter. He writes that the document, which includes various nations' proposals, shows the US government, in particular, taking a vastly different stance than the other nations. Geist notes:
[Other nations have argued for] balance, promotion of the public domain, protection of public health, and measures to ensure that IP rights themselves do not become barriers to trade. The opposition to these objective[s] by the US and Japan (Australia has not taken a position) speaks volumes about their goals for the TPP.
The medical industry has a stake in the outcome, too, with credible critics saying it would raise drug prices and, according to Love's analysis, give surgeons patent protection for their procedures.
Congress has shown little appetite for restraining the overweening power of the corporate interests promoting this expansion. With few exceptions, lawmakers have repeatedly given copyright, patent and trademark interests more control over the years. So we shouldn't be too optimistic about the mini-flurry of Capitol Hill opposition to the treaty that emerged this week. It's based much more on Congress protecting its prerogatives – worries about the treaty's so-called "fast track" authorities, giving the president power to act without congressional approval – than on substantive objections to the document's contents.
That said, some members of Congress have become more aware of the deeper issues. The public revolt against the repugnant "Stop Online Piracy Act" two years ago was a taste of what happens when people become more widely aware of what they can lose when governments and corporate interests collude.
If they become aware – that's the key. One of TPP's most abhorrent elements has been the secrecy under which it's been negotiated. The Obama administration's fondness for secret laws, policies and methods has a lot to do with a basic reality: the public would say no to much of which is done in our names and with our money if we knew what was going on. As Senator Elizabeth Warren pointed out, in a letter to the White House:
I have heard the argument that transparency would undermine the administration's policy to complete the trade agreement because public opposition would be significant. If transparency would lead to widespread public opposition to a trade agreement, then that trade agreement should not be the policy of the United States. I believe in transparency and democracy and I think the US Trade Representative should too.
Thanks to WikiLeaks, we have at least partial transparency today. The more you know about the odious TPP, the less you'll like it – and that's why the administration and its corporate allies don't want you to know.
Related
13 Nov 2013
WikiLeaks publishes secret draft chapter of Trans-Pacific Partnership
11 Nov 2013
Want 'free trade'? Open the medical and drug industry to competition
11 Nov 2013
Vince Cable counts on Russia visit to boost exports
5 Nov 2013
Global financial crisis hit happiness and trust in governments – OECD
More from the Guardian
The Golden Compass recap: how a literary triumph was turned to dust 10 Nov 2013
Hunger Games stars tell Jennifer Lawrence to return Oscar for forgetting lines 11 Nov 2013
The problem with anti-rape underwear 11 Nov 2013
The chances for gun control in the US are slim 13 Nov 2013
Lily Allen does not represent all feminism – and nor should she 13 Nov 2013
What's this?
More from around the web
You Snooze, You Lose? Wrong. Russell Foster on the Science of Sleep (The Financialist)
Patrick Stewart Officially Married…Thanks to Ian McKellen (Theater Mania)
9 Maps to Change How You See the World (Goodnet)
10 Predictions on the Future of Technology (Enterprise Efficiency)
Ten countries account for 76% of total enslaved people (globalslaveryindex.org)
NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
More from On digital being
Dan Gillmor is director of the Knight centre for digital media entrepreneurship at Arizona State University's Walter Cronkite school of journalism and mass communication. His most recent book is Mediactive (2010), also a blog of the same name, about how people can be empowered as new media users. This series focuses on technological developments, especially as they affect media, and aims to show how people can move from being passive consumers of media to active users. Follow Dan on Twitter @dangillmor
WikiLeaks publishes secret draft chapter of Trans-Pacific Partnership
WikiLeaks publishes secret draft chapter of Trans-Pacific Partnership
13 Nov 2013
The Trans-Pacific Partnership, negotiated in secret between 12 Pacific Rim nations, "would trample over individual rights and free expression" according to Julian Assange
11 Nov 2013
Want 'free trade'? Open the medical and drug industry to competition
11 Nov 2013
Vince Cable counts on Russia visit to boost exports
5 Nov 2013
Global financial crisis hit happiness and trust in governments – OECD
Julian Assange may get chance at Senate seat in Western Australia
Julian Assange may get chance at Senate seat in Western Australia
4 Nov 2013
If the high court orders a fresh election the WikiLeaks party founder could make up for not being elected in Victoria
© 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.
Towards clarity about who is on whose side in Israel and how Israel influences the degree of instability in the Middle East
Do you want a quick overview of the reality regarding Israel, Zionism, Israeli anti-Zionists, apartheid against the Palestinians and the general condition of this part of the world that has changed the planet into a war zone? Don't look further:
Here are the links you need:
but this is my favourite one among them:
All students in Grades 11 and 12 and above must attempt a read and crunch this article for an incisive view of the reality by Max Blumenthal. For other comments refer to @kirimba on Twitter.
Try to find ways of better understanding how events in one part of the world can innocuously affect us here, for example, in Kenya.
Try to see how the ICC hearing for Uhuru and Ruto will come to practically nothing and why, and why they won't make a call until the Syria situation has been sorted conclusively.
Try to understand why Iran and Russia are in control of the negotiations at Geneva 2 and in general. Our children have to be made to understand the realities of these geopolitical forces. Here is a link for the USA's worry about nuclear war if they don't come to a fair agreement about Iran:
Here are the links you need:
http://www.truthdig.com/search/results?q=blumenthal+goliath&x=0&y=0&cx=007550919732032875355%3Albmkk4fviak&cof=FORID%3A11
but this is my favourite one among them:
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/imploding_the_myth_of_israel_20131103
All students in Grades 11 and 12 and above must attempt a read and crunch this article for an incisive view of the reality by Max Blumenthal. For other comments refer to @kirimba on Twitter.
Try to find ways of better understanding how events in one part of the world can innocuously affect us here, for example, in Kenya.
Try to see how the ICC hearing for Uhuru and Ruto will come to practically nothing and why, and why they won't make a call until the Syria situation has been sorted conclusively.
Try to understand why Iran and Russia are in control of the negotiations at Geneva 2 and in general. Our children have to be made to understand the realities of these geopolitical forces. Here is a link for the USA's worry about nuclear war if they don't come to a fair agreement about Iran:
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/11/13/334544/global-nuclear-war-likely-if-iran-talks-fail/
Monday, 11 November 2013
Only America has the right to do that!
Here is an email exchange between Janis and me:
Human Rights Watch is pointing at Iran as follows in the article linked here:
Iran: Set an Immediate Moratorium on Executions!
Here is Janis's reply:
I tweeted and asked tweeps to compare this to the drone executions and come up with some differences between them and what Iran is being accused of doing
Pakistan's figures on drone strikes (tweeted by @kirimba)
Mohamed Jiwa
www.habaripoacoolnews.blogspot.com
I noticed a "Do You Know Islam" ad down below my work. Welcome to click on it but it may not have all the information anyone would need about Islam so do refer any questions to me, if you are studying it? Remember that the world of Islam suffered from schisms right from the start.
Human Rights Watch is pointing at Iran as follows in the article linked here:
Iran: Set an Immediate Moratorium on Executions!
In 2012 Iran remained one of the world’s foremost executioners, with more than 500 prisoners hanged either in prisons or in public. The Iranian government has announced at least 260 executions in 2013, with rights groups alleging or documenting an additional 160 or so unannounced executions. At least 15 of these executions have been carried out in connection with terrorism-related charges such as moharebeh. The vast majority of executions carried out in Iran during the past few years are for alleged drug-related offenses including trafficking, which are crimes not considered “most serious” under international law.
Here is Janis's reply:
My subject heading: More on Iran executions comparative (eg drone strikes)
Well, obviously only the United States has the right to do that. We have the right to execute heads of state and install our own version of government that you should have. That is common knowledge. You should know that.And my apology:
I am sorry. I thought they were here to protect us. I was ready to argue about this with a friend whose family are potentially targeted terrorists. The(ir)Janis:yjob is to get killed and ours is to bury them. When it happens, now, I can tell him, "I told you so! The American(s) are doing this to protect us from people like your parents!"
absolutely!
I tweeted and asked tweeps to compare this to the drone executions and come up with some differences between them and what Iran is being accused of doing
Pakistan's figures on drone strikes (tweeted by @kirimba)
@McKGraKucPauNad @cinnamon_carter #drone just read that Pakistan's take on figures - much lower: http://t.co/6XZMR6g4U6 I just don't get itFigures from The Bureau of Investigative Journalism
While on the subject of drones http://t.co/3ERE1mVmfa
http://t.co/NgcMpW5xTI mind-tearing figures on drone war @McKGraKucPauNad #war (March 2013) @cinnamon_carter #drone
RT @TheRealKeori: A graphic of all US global #drone strikes through January 2013. Look. Really look. http://t.co/8vcnvi3ClM (http://stats.areppim.com/stats/stats_dronewar_global.htm)
Mohamed Jiwa
www.habaripoacoolnews.blogspot.com
I noticed a "Do You Know Islam" ad down below my work. Welcome to click on it but it may not have all the information anyone would need about Islam so do refer any questions to me, if you are studying it? Remember that the world of Islam suffered from schisms right from the start.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)